Welcome to Commodity Education and Training

We, at The Joker Brokers, have a combined experience of over 50 years in the grey market, off-ledger business. We thought that it is important to be educational, informative, and helpful to those that really would like to know about this business. If you are serious about this business it would be very important to be educational and informative.

We are going to discuss serious matters, for people seriously interested in international trade and higher finance.

As a member of our community you will receive periodic emails specific to those interests explored at our blog or The Joker Brokers, and this will include real trade procedures and documentation, compliance issues, fraud, scams, and everything relating to international business/finance from the point of view of those that have closed.

We have associates that are International Lawyers, corporate traders, brokers, export/import experts, intermediaries, even trained Bankers. All of these people find this list, the services, and products offered at The Joker Brokers to be very useful. If you want to learn more about international trading, commodities, import and export, and the whole realm of this business you will benefit from our membership. In fact, we are so sure that if you do not benefit from our membership then we will be more than happy to have you discuss with one of our associates (closers) what it really takes to make a close.


Monday, March 14, 2011

Common Hazards for Brokers

There's common misappropriate utilization of terms like "broker, intermediary," and "self-styled commitment holder." the reality is, these aren't official terms in banking or finance, but such terms are used inside banking programs, and in their communication between one another. The issue with brokers is they claim to be someone with that title, for example "trader," but that does not invariably mean or guarantee anything. Anyone can call himself a trader, or a commitment holder, or anything. If somebody is attempting to buy and resell something, they are definitely a trader of a kind. This is a little out of the way and can be a poor example, but these positions can only be authenticated at the central bank level, or at a bank with an International Bank Account Number (IBAN). There will always be a broker introducing a client to the program.
The reason our banks can't solicit for these programs is that it is the law and neither can brokers, middlemen, or self-styled traders. Nevertheless a broker may know a customer with money, who knows another broker, who works in association with a program. We would like to point education and training in programs is different than solicitation for one.

Through correct education and training, a good broker should be well placed to screen potential customers by filtering the most promising candidates, and simultaneously, be well placed to without delay communicate with a banker through email to register the possible client.

Common hazards a broker or self-styled trader can meet during their own work in this business are:
  • They have to be in a position to handle masses of clients before finding the best candidate.
  • They typically get part of the truth concerning the client's funds at an initial stage, that may be found later to be infeasible, even after weeks or months of working on it.
  • They usually have trouble qualifying themselves with new clients because they can't show any previous performance, or past contract, and the relationship with the customer is simply a matter of trust at an initial stage.
  • There may be an extensive list of brokers and / or arbitrators between the customer and the banking program.
In this example, some brokers in the middle can destroy the deal by not giving the proper information to the customer, or to the banking program, and / or causing issues with the profit sharing agreements.

There might be a few levels concerned with the brokers: the nearest one to the banking program, also on occasion called the facilitator, is the most significant person.

This person ought to have a contact with somebody in the banking program. This business is simple if a broker has a customer with acceptable funds. You'd need a clear customer with funds for 30,000,000 or even more in a top world bank, and a broker in contact with a banking program. By "clear" customer, we mean a customer who can offer a real monthly bank statement, showing that they've a 30,000,000 equivalent in liquid money.

Nevertheless from a practical viewpoint, this is the ultimate situation that's so surprising, that most brokers won't ever see it in their life. We don't mean to deter you as a potential broker, but almost all of the clients generally have issues with their funds, they don't seem to be in full command of them, they don't wish to move them, the funds aren't cleared, or they're not cooperative enough to cope with the banking programs and their direct associates. Additionally, many brokers disguised as clients will show a bank guarantee, standby letter-of-credit, certificate of deposit, or any other instrument like a medium-term note, to make claims that they have the capacity to work with the banking program. Most of the time, the instruments, whether public or personal, are borrowed or leased instruments, and are infrequently fake. To conclude, the broker's job is an exceedingly nerve wracking activity. Any new candidate may have a tough time teaching himself before getting the right disposition. Disappointment is sure, and patience is always a virtue. One of the advantages of our services is to alleviate our own clients of the strain and frustration of trying to discover a customer or a banking program.

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Soft Offers Explained

There is no such thing as a soft offer, soft offers don't exist. All offers are liable to last approval, offers aren't reliant on final confirmation however quotations are, or request for quotations (RFQ's). This is a legal matter in contract law offer and acknowledgment are well outlined; offers indicate eagerness to contract on certain terms, the aim being that it shall become binding as fast as it is accepted by the individual addressed, the offeree. Offers must be accepted precisely as presented, without alteration. Any alteration is a counter-offer and destroys the first offer. This has to be accepted. However, requests for extra info and clarification don't represent a counter offer.
Now, it's right that under USA UCC or Uniform Commercial Code, there are some differences in how offers acknowledgment ties. The UCC permits definite expression of offer approval, or written confirmation of ad-hoc agreements, to represent valid approval even though further terms are mentioned or different terms from the primary offer or agreement are said.
Such extra terms are then treated as suggestions for addition into the governing contract and in effect become part of the contract unless the opening offer in particular boundaries acknowledgment to the offers terms or notification of objection to the such terms is presented in a fair time frame, and under certain other conditions. The conditions outlining an offer of sale include price, completion date, payment terms, and detailed fair outline of the service or product, including condition and quantities. Offers can be revoked before acceptance, so long as it isn't encompassed in a choice, by satisfactory communication to the offeree. You can literally write a credible offer with a Bic pen on a piece of paper if you wished to, and it might still be binding, even if that sounds a bit crazy.
 
Under USA UCC codes, and well as trade law as recognized by the EU and United Countries, quotes and offers are two separate undertakings and offers are binding under acknowledgment, where a soft offer would not make sense. Legally almost everywhere a quote is known as non binding (with a couple of minor exceptions in some scenarios, in certain domestic environments like the United States, in which explicit indication is given). For that reason there isn't any such thing as a soft offer, despite the odd use of this term by some traders and by law all offers are binding per and subject to the terms suggested.
 
Purchase orders are like offers in this regards. Offers generally are binding at time of acknowledgment. Under UK law such approval doesn't need to be suggested at the time of acknowledgment, legally it still is binding and under US law such approval does have to be suggested, once done it is jointly binding.
 
Either way an officially accepted offer is binding on all parties, in a similar way a contract is. This has to be accepted, offers create contractually binding conditions.
 
Plain and simple, soft offers don't exist, the word offer has particular legal definitions. Again, you can consult with any trade attorney to clear this up. This explains why there is no such thing as a soft offer. The phrase soft offer could be used informally in specific areas but this is a non standard use and thus evaded to stop confusion due to non standard terms.
 
Again, to recap by law all offers are legally binding thus actually a soft offer doesn't exist, while soft non binding quotations can and do exist. These details are crucial to understand, don't undervalue their significance.

For more information please visit: Professional Commodity Training

Sunday, February 13, 2011

You think your are closing a deal in three days?

One of the attributes of business is the transfer of funds from bank to bank.  We have talked to those that "think" they are going to get paid on a deal in three days. We ask "have you talked to your banker where the funds are going to be wired?" The answer is "No, I haven't." Our answer to them is they have no clue to what they are involved in or what they are doing.

For example, you happen to close a transaction and you have given all your banking information to the appropriate parties. You know for sure the deal is going to close and let's say you are going to get 1 million bucks in profit sharing arrangements. Of course, for those that understand this business the funds do go into an escrow account of a well established attorney. The question is you want your money wired to your account to a different bank. Have you told your banker about the transaction? Let's say you haven't. Now 1 million dollars is going to go to your account and you haven't informed your banker, what do you think he/she is going to do? One Million bucks came from where? Do I need to explain more? Unless you regularly do deals this large your banker is going to question the source of funds, bottom line. That is why, as contrary to jokers, these deals do not take place in three days as I have been told numerous times. Unless you already have the existing relationship and transactional history.

This is why asking for an "MFPA" otherwise known as a Master Fee Protection Agreement upfront is nonsense and just broker talk. You have to have the established relationship with those you are working with and also your Banker. The bank will need to know the source of funds - period. And not the quote that funds are clean, free, of all criminal origin. It does not work that way. If your banker has any doubts your funds will be in question if you do not inform him beforehand with documentation.

If you have any doubts and you think you have a deal that is closing call your banker today and tell him that I believe One Million Dollars may be deposited in my account in the near future. See what he/she says?

For more information please visit:  Professional Commodity Training

Borrowing Certificate of Deposits

Borrowing a CD or certificate of deposit is fairly easy when the client has the funds available.  The issuer is able to put a CD for you on DTC/Euroclear or delivered via SWIFT.  An important thing to keep in mind, DTC/Euroclear is typcally more cost effective for delivery of the instrument.

Once the instrument is placed on screen and validated by your banker, the placement charge is to be paid inside forty eight hours. The instrument will be issued for a term of one year to five years with an option to renew were the backend payment is due inside sixty days after placement of the instrument on screen and delivered to the client via MT-760 if using swift.

The issuers CD's as stipulated and agreed on by contract, are allotted in an individual or company name, and are basically used for supply of a project, commercial endeavors, and balance sheet and credit enhancement.

The typical time frame to complete a CD transaction for new clients is 45 to 60 days.

All instruments are AA rated from Top World Banks. The CD's may be employed for collateral purposes and permit lending. As a borrower, you may be allotted a quoted Bank Instrument from a major global financial institution, allotted straight in your name. Your instrument is placed on DTC with a one, three, or five year time for borrowing the instrument.  Over 90 percent of the clients borrow the instrument for five years as it is more cost effective to do so.

Transactions are from a minimum quantity of 10 million dollars if delivered via DTC/Euroclear and 50 million dollars if delivered vis swift.  However, the minimum can be agreed up with a cooperative and qualified client.  The Bank Instrument must be returned unencumbered to the Bank 15 days before its maturity date or the client may have an option to renew the term of the lease. It is easy to extend the lending period for another 5 years (annual cost remains the one of first year) with fifteen pre-advice days if issuance is via swift.  The CD's are available on DTC or they can have bank to bank (MT799 form) confirmation where they're cash-backed with repository receipt. The issuer CD's are in one to five year increments with low up front cost and structured payments. The client gets DTC info to determine the instrument when set up charge is escrowed. A set up charge gets the CD started and live for the first sixty days. Payment for the balance of the annual charge is based on the term of borrowing the instrument and is due inside sixty days with a payment guarantee from the bank.

For more information please visit Professional Commodity Training 

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

URC 522 Articles

As we have stated on our website if you see the LOI or BCL in the procedures you are wasting your time.  The best situation for the intermediary is to find the end supplier or principal and work the deal as we stated with the DCL. (This is primarily for bulk commodities). You can otherwise step back after sourcing the end buyer connect the end buyer to your source in return for protection in the deal. 
 
After you have the proper documentation in order it is time for collections.  You want to get paid on the guarantee of the presented IDCL.  The most widely used reference for collections is the ICC regulations URC 522.  The URC stands for Unified Rules for Collections. The URC's rules are of some concern to intermediaries because they govern the collection of the buyers' remittances on how one collects on getting paid and these regulations more or less reinforce the UCP (500 and 600) and detail how such payments are contractually required and are to be made.
 
The URC:  1) "Application of URC 522 applies to all collections as defined in article 2 where such rules are incorporated into the text of the 'collection instruction' referred to in article 4 and are binding on all parties thereto unless otherwise expressly agreed or contrary to the provisions of a national, state or  local law and/or regulation which cannot be departed from."  When the URC is referred to in a collection instrument, in a contractually binding situation between multiple parties, it directly applies to the direct collections  of payments in the mode specified on that collection instrument Incorporating URC rules into an offer or contract makes it binding on everyone (all parties) to obviously the buyer and seller. A bank is not irrevocably obligated to handle a particular payment collection or instruction relating to that payment collection. The reason this has to be considered is a bank can choose to handle a collection, or not to. If a bank elects, for any reason, not to handle a collection or any related instructions received by it; it must advise the party from whom it received the collection or the instructions by telecommunication or, if that is not possible, by other expeditious means, without delay. While banks are not obligated to handle a payment collection for a party, if it chooses, however, not to, it is required to inform the party sending  the collection instructions at once.
 
We are not going to into much more and bore you with procedures and regulations.  If you have the chance review URC 522 at your leisure.  One important aspect is you will soon realize the ICC gives little protection to intermediaries.
 
For more information please review Professional Commodity Training

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Standby Letters of Credit Part II

Letter of credit traits are letters of credit which are customarily debatable. The issuing bank is obliged to pay not just the beneficiary, but also any bank designated by the beneficiary. Debatable instruments are passed readily from one party to another just about in a rather similar way as cash. To be debatable, the letter of credit must include an unconditional guarantee to pay, on demand or at a definite time. The designated bank becomes a holder in due course. As a holder in due course, the holder takes the letter of credit for value honestly, without warning of any claims against it. A holder in due course is treated favourably under the UCC or the Uniform Commercial Code.
 
The exchange is thought of as a straight negotiation if the issuing bank's payment requirement extends only to the beneficiary of the credit.
 
If a letter of credit is a straight negotiation it is referenced on its face by "we engage with you" or "available with ourselves". Under these conditions the guarantee doesn't pass to a shopper of the draft as a holder in due course. Revocability letters of credit might be either revocable or irrevocable. A revocable letter of credit might be revoked or altered for whatever reason, at any point by the issuing bank without notification. A revocable letter of credit can't be confirmed. If a private bank is engaged in an exchange that involves a revocable letter of credit, it serves as the advising bank.
 
Once the documents have been presented and meet the T&Cs, or Times and Credits, in the letter of credit, and the draft is honoured, the letter of credit can't be revoked.
 
The revocable letter of credit isn't a generally used instrument. It is typically used to provide laws for shipment. If a letter of credit is revocable it would be referenced on its face. The irrevocable letter of credit would possibly not be revoked or amended without the accord of the issuing bank, the confirming bank, and the beneficiary. An irrevocable letter of credit from the issuing bank insures the beneficiary that if the mandatory documents are presented and the terms are went along with, payment will be made. If a letter of credit is irrevocable it is referenced on its face.
 
The beneficiary has the right to transfer or allot the privilege to draw, under a credit just when the credit states it's transferable or assignable. Credits ruled by the Uniform Commercial Code (Domestic , or the United States) perhaps transferred a vast number of times. Under the Uniform Customs Practice for Documentary Credits (World) the credit may be transferred only once. But whether or not the credit specifies that it's nontransferable or nonassignable, the beneficiary may transfer their rights before performance of conditions of the credit. 
 
All letters of credit need the beneficiary to give a draft and stipulated documents to receive payment. A draft is a written order by that the party making it, orders another party to pay money to a 3rd party. A draft is also known as a bill of exchange. There are two kinds of drafts: sight and time. A sight draft is owing as fast as it is presented for payment.
 
The bank is authorized a fair time to review the documents before making payment. A time draft isn't due till the lapse of a selected time period stated on the draft.
 
The bank is needed to accept the draft as fast as the documents go along with credit terms. The issuing bank has a fair time to look at those documents. The issuing bank is responsible to accept drafts and pay them at maturity. The standby letter of credit serves a different function than the commercial letter of credit in obvious cases stated above.
 
The commercial letter of credit is the first payment mechanism for an exchange. The standby letter of credit is a secondary payment mechanism. A bank will issue a standby letter of credit for a buyer to provide assurances of his capability to perform under the provisions of a contractual arrangement between the beneficiary. The parties concerned with the exchange don't expect the letter of credit will ever be drawn on. The standby letter of credit assures the beneficiary of the performance of the customer's duty. The beneficiary is able to draw under the credit by presenting a draft, copies of invoices, with proof the buyer hasn't performed its requirement. The bank is obliged to make payment if the documents presented go along with the details of the letter of credit. Standby letters of credit are issued by banks to stand behind financial duties, to insure the refund of upfront fee, to support performance and bid needs, and to insure the completion of a sales contract.
 
The usage of the letters of credit as a tool to reduce risk has grown significantly over the last decade.
 
Letters of credit do their purpose by replacing the credit of the bank for that of the customer, for the sake of facilitating international trade. The credit pro should be acquainted with two kinds of letters of credit: commercial and standby. Commercial letters of credit are used essentially to aid foreign trade. The commercial letter of credit is the first payment mechanism for an exchange.
 
The standby letter of credit serves a different function. The standby letter of credit is a secondary payment mechanism. The bank will issue the credit for a purchaser to provide assurances of his capability to perform under the conditions of a contract. On invoice of the letter of credit, the credit pro should review all items meticulously to insure that what's predicted of the vendor is totally accepted and he can comply with all of the terms. When compliance is in query, the customer should be asked to modify the credit.
 
For more information please visit:  Professional Commodity Training

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Standby Letters of Credit Part I

Letters of credit do their purpose by replacing the credit of the bank for that of the buyer, for the sake of facilitating international trade.

There are two main types: commercial and standby letters of credit.

The commercial letter of credit is the primary payment mechanism for an exchange, while the standby letter of credit is a secondary payment mechanism. Commercial letters of credit have been employed for many years to aid payment in global trade. Their use may continue to increase as the world economy develops. Letters of credit utilized in global transactions are ruled by the World Chamber of Commerce Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits. The general provisions and definitions of the World Chamber of Commerce are binding on all parties. Domestic collections in the U. S. are ruled by the Uniform Commercial Code.

A commercial letter of credit is a contractual agreement between a bank, called the issuing bank, for one of its consumers, authorizing another bank, called the advising or confirming bank, to make payment to the beneficiary. The issuing bank, on the request of its customer, opens the letter of credit. The issuing bank makes a dedication to respect drawings made under the credit. The beneficiary is usually the provider of products and/or services.

Fundamentally, the issuing bank replaces the bank's shopper as the payee.

Elements of a Letter of Credit:

A payment undertaking given by a bank (issuing bank)  for a customer (candidate).

To pay a seller (beneficiary) for a fixed amount of cash.

On display of cited documents representing the provision of products.

Inside cited time boundaries.

Documents must comply with T&Cs laid out in the letter of credit.

Documents to be presented at a stated place. 

The beneficiary has entitlement to payment so long as he will be able to supply the documentary proof needed by the letter of credit. The letter of credit is a definite and separate exchange from the contract on which it is based. All parties deal in documents and not in products. The issuing bank isn't responsible for performance of the fundamental contract existing between the buyer and beneficiary. The issuing bank's requirement to the purchaser, is to look at all documents to insure that they meet all of the conditions of the credit. On asking for requirement for payment the beneficiary warrants that all conditions of the contract have been went along with.

If the beneficiary (seller) fits with the letter of credit, the vendor must be paid by the bank.  The issuing bank's culpability to pay and to be repaid from its client becomes profound on the completion of the conditions of the letter of credit. Under the provisions of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, the bank is given a fair quantity of time after bill of the documents to laud the draft.

The issuing bank's role is to offer a guarantee to the vendor that if compliant documents are presented, the bank will pay the vendor the sum outstanding and to look at the documents, and only pay if these documents go along with the terms set down in the letter of credit. Generally the documents requested will include a commercial invoice, a transport document like a bill of lading or airway bill and an insurance document; but there are several others.

Letters of credit deal in documents, not products.  An advising bank, sometimes a foreign reporter bank of the issuing bank will counsel the beneficiary.  Usually, the beneficiary would like to utilize a local bank to insure the letter of credit is valid. Additionally, the advising bank would be answerable for sending the documents to the issuing bank. The advising bank has no other obligation under the letter of credit. If the issuing bank doesn't pay the beneficiary, the advising bank isn't responsible to pay.  The correspondent bank may confirm the letter of credit for the beneficiary at the request of the issuing bank, the correspondent obligates itself to insure payment under the letter of credit. The confirming bank wouldn't confirm the credit until it evaluated the country and bank where the letter of credit originates.

For more information please visit:  Professional Commodity Training 

Commodity Trading